New Hope For Biomass Fuels
Biomass fuel is liquid, solid, or gaseous fuel produced by conversion of biomass. They are actually organic materials produced by plants, animals, or microorganisms. Those plants animals or microorganisms can be burned directly as a heat source or they can be converted into a gaseous or liquid fuel. Scientists are looking to biomass for sources of alternative fuels. Biomass can be directly converted to energy (not appealing for an environmentalists or non compatible to modern day living) or converted to liquid or gaseous fuels such as ethanol, methanol, methane, and hydrogen.
Los Alamos National Laboratory researchers have discovered the secret of hardness of plant cell walls. They have discovered the fact why cell walls of some plants are so tough. This peek into the toughness of plant material could lead to a cost-effective and energy-efficient strategy for turning biomass into alternative fuels. Los Alamos researchers have published two papers separately in Biophysical Journal and recently in an issue of Biomacromolecules, These scientists have recognized the potential weaknesses among sheets of cellulose molecules comprising lignocellulosic biomass. That is the fibrous material being derived from plant cell walls. The material is the magical substance because it is the abundant source of sugar that can be used to brew batches of methanol or butanol, and ultimately can be converted into biofuels.
How cellulose is synthesized into plant cells? It is the result of polymerization. In polymerization, molecules of glucose (a simple sugar) join into long chains. The plant is known to assemble these chains of cellulose into sheets. The sheets are held together by hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds are mainly an electrostatic attraction of a positive portion of a molecule to a negative portion of the same or neighboring molecule. These cellulose sheets stack atop one another. Stacks join with one another by other bonds that are weaker than hydrogen bonds. The plant then spins these sheets into high-tensile-strength fibers of material.
The bondings between these fibers are extremely strong, but they are incredibly resistant to the action of enzymes called cellulases. The main work of cellulases is to crack the fibers back into their simple-sugar components. Here lies the key to future biomass fuels. Because here we can easily crack up the cellulose into sugars then the sugars can be used to create alternative fuels. The firmness of cellulose fibers is the main hurdle in converting them into simple sugars. United States presently lacks an energy-efficient and cost-effective method for turning inedible biomass such as switch grass or corn husks into a sweet source of biofuels. Researchers are tirelessly working to find a crack into the armor of plants firmness.
Los Alamos researcher Paul Langan is working in collaboration with researchers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolécules Végétales in France. They are making use of neutrons to investigate the crystalline structure of highly crystalline cellulose – the same way a doctor uses an X-ray to find out the anomalies in our body. Langan and his colleagues found that although cellulose generally has a well-ordered network of hydrogen bonds holding it together, the material also displays significant amounts of disorder, creating a different type of hydrogen bond network at certain surfaces. These differences make the molecule potentially vulnerable to an attack by cellulase enzymes.
Tongye Shen and Gnana Gnanakaran discusss in Biophysical Journal, about a new lattice-based model of crystalline cellulose. The model exhibits that how hydrogen bonds in cellulose shift to remain stable under a wide range of temperatures. This plasticity permits the material to exchange different types of hydrogen bonds but also restrains the molecules. This way molecules form bonds in the weaker configuration described by Langan and his colleagues. Most important aspect of Shen and Gnanakaran’s model is that hydrogen bonds can be manipulated via temperature differences. This manipulation works to make the material more susceptible to attack by enzymes that can crack the fibers into sugars for biofuel production.
Related posts:
Interested in writing news articles about alternative energy? Contact Us




April 28th, 2009
I don’t understand why I don’t hear more about Butanol instead of Ethanol. The former is a 1-to-1 replacement for gasoline and doesn’t require the special infrastructure that Ethanol does (which can typically be used in quantities of 15% or less mixed with gas). Check out http://butanol.com/.
April 28th, 2009
I go for hydrogen from non food sources, look at corn, because it was used to produce ethanol, it become more expensive, and the world is paying for it, wrong. Hydrogen on the other hand will not hurt anybody, and will clean up the planet, and we will never run out of it, so please push for it.
Francisco
April 28th, 2009
Among all renewable energy resources, biomass is the only resource that can be converted in a relatively direct way into fuels. It is not an option of energy development! It is a must; there is no other choice.
South-East Asia, in particular Indonesia, has a large potential to become one of the world’s biofuel centers.
April 29th, 2009
Butanol (and Butanediol and propanol to some extent) are achievable by biological organisms, but possible, and fitting for industrial microbiology are two differing concepts. The yeast strains we use to convert sugar to ethanol, have been optimized for centuries to produce high quantities of ethanol while developing the means to protect their membranes from the damage that ethanol can cause.
Now you try to crowbar butanol production in a yeast strain that isn’t optimized to deal its effects on its membranes, you would only be able to produce a minimal amount of butanol before it becomes harmful to the organism producing it.
Therefor possible, but not economically viable. (much like ethanol from biomass!)
April 29th, 2009
Apparently, Don, you didn’t study the website I listed. The fellow in Ohio has apparently come up with a process that does make Butanol economically viable on par with if not better than Ethanol.
May 1st, 2009
Mixed alcohol from all types of biomass, including the beetle kill trees. Anything that has a free carbon will work for our technology, of course some are better than others. The fuel we make will be the standard fuel immediately so why don’t we hear more about Ecalene(tm) the real replacement for all fuels.