<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negative Impacts of Incineration-based Waste-to-Energy Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/</link>
	<description>Alternative Energy News and Information about Renewable Energy Technologies: Articles, Discussions, News and Videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenton</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-11724</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-11724</guid>
		<description>Is there a low-cost system that will work in a third world country?  Waste is a huge issue here, with tons of garbage each week.  One of the largest costs here in the second largest city in this country is the disposal of garbage.  If that cost could be turned into energy instead and help keep the country clean it is a win-win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a low-cost system that will work in a third world country?  Waste is a huge issue here, with tons of garbage each week.  One of the largest costs here in the second largest city in this country is the disposal of garbage.  If that cost could be turned into energy instead and help keep the country clean it is a win-win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demostic</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-11551</link>
		<dc:creator>demostic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-11551</guid>
		<description>Hi salman, thank you for your expository write up. Can we like Clitton, get in touch with you through your email? All hands must be on deck to use alternative waste to energy which obviously help to reduce emissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi salman, thank you for your expository write up. Can we like Clitton, get in touch with you through your email? All hands must be on deck to use alternative waste to energy which obviously help to reduce emissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-8985</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-8985</guid>
		<description>Hi Pablo and Salman,....

as we following and study all serious info about WTE and latest CHP technologies, please send me also the details of your mentioned Waste Gasification / Thermal Oxidation Plant (WG / TO) system. Can you inform us also where this technology was running ?

Thanks,  Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pablo and Salman,&#8230;.</p>
<p>as we following and study all serious info about WTE and latest CHP technologies, please send me also the details of your mentioned Waste Gasification / Thermal Oxidation Plant (WG / TO) system. Can you inform us also where this technology was running ?</p>
<p>Thanks,  Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salman</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-8732</link>
		<dc:creator>Salman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-8732</guid>
		<description>Hi Pablo,

Thanks for sharing this information.The technology looks interesting. I would like to know more about the capacity and cost of your system. Kindly write to me at bioenergyconsult [AT] gmail.com

Best wishes
Salman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pablo,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this information.The technology looks interesting. I would like to know more about the capacity and cost of your system. Kindly write to me at bioenergyconsult [AT] gmail.com</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Salman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Colman</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-8719</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Colman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-8719</guid>
		<description>Dear Sirs, I have been following the discussion initiated by Mr. Salman Safar, and I would like to know your opinions regarding the technology that I am going to describe below, best regards and thanks a lot.

 The Waste Gasification / Thermal Oxidation Plant (WG / TO) is a two-stage waste combustion process that converts combustible organic matter from its existing solid, sludge or liquid state into a gas under an oxygen depleted environment (also known as “oxidation”). The resulting gas product is then well mixed with ambient air before being burnt off (flared) in a secondary gas-processing unit.

The WG / TO is comprised of three basic components: a Primary Gasification Cell, a Secondary Gas Processor, and a computerized Process Logic Controller. Combustible waste material is placed into the primary gasification cell through the load access door. In some facilities this can be done via a loading conveyor. The proposed design is to have collection vehicles dump their Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) load directly into the primary oxidation cell.

The Primary Cell can be either a batch or continuous feed processor. Based on our experience, batch processing provides the most efficient and cost effective strategy for the waste management solution. In the case of batch processing once the cell has received that days collected waste, the door is closed and the process is initiated. The cell does not have to be full for the system to be activated.

An operator is responsible for supervising the loading of waste material, and initiating the process start-up. A computer keystroke (or optional manual button and lever control) which pre-heats the secondary gas-processing unit accomplishes this start-up. Once that unit reaches its pre-set temperature, the primary gasification cell heater is activated, and the process begins. 8 to 12 hours later, the organic wastes in the primary cell will have been converted to a gas, and the cycle will generally be complete.

With the help of the Process Logic Computer (PLC) , the operator can evaluate the end of the gasification cycle by observing the change in oxygen content of the stack gas in the primary cell, and a predictable deadline in the primary cell temperature. Once these  final conditions are reached, the PLC will indicate to the operator that the cycle is finished, and the system will move to its “cool down” mode. In another 4-6 hours, the system may be re-loaded, and another process started, with or without the removal of the preceding load’s ash material.

Residual materials (bottles, cans, ash and misc.) need only to be removed periodically. The composition of MSW consists mainly of organic and combustible waste. Glass and metals are easily extracted in our plant design as it includes equipment that will assist in the process and cut down on labor man-hours. Ash removal is either an automated or manual process. In automated unloading, the base of the primary gasification cell contains a ductile iron furnace floor conveyor that evacuates material remaining in the base of the unit through a side access door. This dry waste material empties into a storage bin, which can be removed to another location for recycling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sirs, I have been following the discussion initiated by Mr. Salman Safar, and I would like to know your opinions regarding the technology that I am going to describe below, best regards and thanks a lot.</p>
<p> The Waste Gasification / Thermal Oxidation Plant (WG / TO) is a two-stage waste combustion process that converts combustible organic matter from its existing solid, sludge or liquid state into a gas under an oxygen depleted environment (also known as “oxidation”). The resulting gas product is then well mixed with ambient air before being burnt off (flared) in a secondary gas-processing unit.</p>
<p>The WG / TO is comprised of three basic components: a Primary Gasification Cell, a Secondary Gas Processor, and a computerized Process Logic Controller. Combustible waste material is placed into the primary gasification cell through the load access door. In some facilities this can be done via a loading conveyor. The proposed design is to have collection vehicles dump their Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) load directly into the primary oxidation cell.</p>
<p>The Primary Cell can be either a batch or continuous feed processor. Based on our experience, batch processing provides the most efficient and cost effective strategy for the waste management solution. In the case of batch processing once the cell has received that days collected waste, the door is closed and the process is initiated. The cell does not have to be full for the system to be activated.</p>
<p>An operator is responsible for supervising the loading of waste material, and initiating the process start-up. A computer keystroke (or optional manual button and lever control) which pre-heats the secondary gas-processing unit accomplishes this start-up. Once that unit reaches its pre-set temperature, the primary gasification cell heater is activated, and the process begins. 8 to 12 hours later, the organic wastes in the primary cell will have been converted to a gas, and the cycle will generally be complete.</p>
<p>With the help of the Process Logic Computer (PLC) , the operator can evaluate the end of the gasification cycle by observing the change in oxygen content of the stack gas in the primary cell, and a predictable deadline in the primary cell temperature. Once these  final conditions are reached, the PLC will indicate to the operator that the cycle is finished, and the system will move to its “cool down” mode. In another 4-6 hours, the system may be re-loaded, and another process started, with or without the removal of the preceding load’s ash material.</p>
<p>Residual materials (bottles, cans, ash and misc.) need only to be removed periodically. The composition of MSW consists mainly of organic and combustible waste. Glass and metals are easily extracted in our plant design as it includes equipment that will assist in the process and cut down on labor man-hours. Ash removal is either an automated or manual process. In automated unloading, the base of the primary gasification cell contains a ductile iron furnace floor conveyor that evacuates material remaining in the base of the unit through a side access door. This dry waste material empties into a storage bin, which can be removed to another location for recycling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterlilly</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-7688</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterlilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-7688</guid>
		<description>What is the difference between a coal fired power plant and a Waste To Energy (WTE) plant? Let&#039;s take a quick look at funding. The coal fired power plants are the most well funded energy lobby in the US. WTE technologies receive less than 1% of that funding, in comparison. Coal requires massive mining operations obliterating entire mountain ranges to granite shards. Garbage - a guaranteed resource, to last as long as humanity does - is the fuel of WTE. Landfilling generates methane. Methane = &gt;20 times worse green house gas than CO2. 

Instead of landfilling the garbage, burning it reduces green house gas emissions, boosts recycling (because those metals are worth a pretty penny), and eliminates the NIMBY syndrome of future landfill sites. But as long as the coal lobby has the upper hand they will do their best to conceal the fact that coal fired power plants account for &gt;80% of the mercury being released into the environment, that account for the high concentrations of mercury in great lake&#039;s fish, and polar marine life. 

In China, 1 new coal fired power plant is opened every five days. When I was in Shanghai, ships sped furiously upriver to provide the hungry power plants with an abundance of coal. Sometimes you had 15 boats one after the other, like rail cars crowding the river. As long as the status quo (energy barons benefiting from the sale of coal and petrol) has it&#039;s hand in the game, there will be no room made for true alternatives using free resources and comparatively benign technologies (WTE). 

As Machiavelli rightfully stated: “It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things. For the reformer has enemies in all those who profit by the old order, and only lukewarm defenders in all those who would profit by the new order, this lukewarmness arising partly from fear of their adversaries, who have the laws in their favour; and partly from the incredulity of mankind, who do not truly believe in anything new until they have had actual experience of it. Thus it arises that on every opportunity for attacking the reformer, his opponents do so with the zeal of partisans, the others only defend him half-heartedly, so that between them he runs great danger.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between a coal fired power plant and a Waste To Energy (WTE) plant? Let&#8217;s take a quick look at funding. The coal fired power plants are the most well funded energy lobby in the US. WTE technologies receive less than 1% of that funding, in comparison. Coal requires massive mining operations obliterating entire mountain ranges to granite shards. Garbage &#8211; a guaranteed resource, to last as long as humanity does &#8211; is the fuel of WTE. Landfilling generates methane. Methane = >20 times worse green house gas than CO2. </p>
<p>Instead of landfilling the garbage, burning it reduces green house gas emissions, boosts recycling (because those metals are worth a pretty penny), and eliminates the NIMBY syndrome of future landfill sites. But as long as the coal lobby has the upper hand they will do their best to conceal the fact that coal fired power plants account for >80% of the mercury being released into the environment, that account for the high concentrations of mercury in great lake&#8217;s fish, and polar marine life. </p>
<p>In China, 1 new coal fired power plant is opened every five days. When I was in Shanghai, ships sped furiously upriver to provide the hungry power plants with an abundance of coal. Sometimes you had 15 boats one after the other, like rail cars crowding the river. As long as the status quo (energy barons benefiting from the sale of coal and petrol) has it&#8217;s hand in the game, there will be no room made for true alternatives using free resources and comparatively benign technologies (WTE). </p>
<p>As Machiavelli rightfully stated: “It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things. For the reformer has enemies in all those who profit by the old order, and only lukewarm defenders in all those who would profit by the new order, this lukewarmness arising partly from fear of their adversaries, who have the laws in their favour; and partly from the incredulity of mankind, who do not truly believe in anything new until they have had actual experience of it. Thus it arises that on every opportunity for attacking the reformer, his opponents do so with the zeal of partisans, the others only defend him half-heartedly, so that between them he runs great danger.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-7358</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-7358</guid>
		<description>Billy Bob the Enviro guy... pull the data at the EPA.  Talk to Wheelabrator (a WM company), go visit a WTE.  This is not a place to post 50 pages of data for you to review.  Still emitting?  LOL, you emitting everytime you speak there Billy Bobby. I can have a bonfire on the farm and but more stuff in the are than a WTE. Bill, what is done with medical waste?  Say Chemo?  1500+ F to get a kill on that stuff.  You want PIMW buried in your local landfill without being cooked?  I don&#039;t.  Don&#039;t spin the autoclave thing either, there is no kill involved.  Oh the ash, can be used.  In India they use it in concrete, can&#039;t get enough of it.  So Billy Bob the Uniformed Enviro, come into the light!  Go talk to some folks at SWANA.  The cost numbers of feeding the WTE in tons, are depending on size of operation desired, thus so the cost of construction impacted.  That would be the prefered numbers, it can be done on a smaller scale.  10 times more costly to build a Special Waste Landfill?  Where did you get that number?  Who&#039;s building that thing; the government?  Wow, $100m usd to build a Fac, again, a govt funded fac. Must be like the Big Dig Project in Boston.  This is clearly a left leaning article.  Without much real world working experience. Nor formal economic education. Go work in the business for a while before writing an article for the Sierra Club.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy Bob the Enviro guy&#8230; pull the data at the EPA.  Talk to Wheelabrator (a WM company), go visit a WTE.  This is not a place to post 50 pages of data for you to review.  Still emitting?  LOL, you emitting everytime you speak there Billy Bobby. I can have a bonfire on the farm and but more stuff in the are than a WTE. Bill, what is done with medical waste?  Say Chemo?  1500+ F to get a kill on that stuff.  You want PIMW buried in your local landfill without being cooked?  I don&#8217;t.  Don&#8217;t spin the autoclave thing either, there is no kill involved.  Oh the ash, can be used.  In India they use it in concrete, can&#8217;t get enough of it.  So Billy Bob the Uniformed Enviro, come into the light!  Go talk to some folks at SWANA.  The cost numbers of feeding the WTE in tons, are depending on size of operation desired, thus so the cost of construction impacted.  That would be the prefered numbers, it can be done on a smaller scale.  10 times more costly to build a Special Waste Landfill?  Where did you get that number?  Who&#8217;s building that thing; the government?  Wow, $100m usd to build a Fac, again, a govt funded fac. Must be like the Big Dig Project in Boston.  This is clearly a left leaning article.  Without much real world working experience. Nor formal economic education. Go work in the business for a while before writing an article for the Sierra Club.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>What are the current alternatives to waste to energy plants similar to that run by Covanta in Rochester, MA?  Is technology changing and is the cost of disposing of waste likely to be reduced substantially from the costs charged to municipalities currently in the Southeastern Massacusetts area?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the current alternatives to waste to energy plants similar to that run by Covanta in Rochester, MA?  Is technology changing and is the cost of disposing of waste likely to be reduced substantially from the costs charged to municipalities currently in the Southeastern Massacusetts area?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidney mehlschmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>sidney mehlschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>The city of Vienna in Austria has a large incinerator right in town which generates steam heat for the nearby General Hospital, as well as numerous other buildings around town.  The exterior was designed by artist Fritz Hundertwasser and is a pretty wild sight to behold. They also produce electricity in the process.  I&#039;m under the impression that the Europeans are much more sensitive to environmental pollution than we are, so I have to assume that their restrictions on air pollution are pretty strict.  Metals are removed from the ash after incineration and recycled. The added benefit, of course, is a severely reduced need for landfill space.  Since we generate so much more garbage per person in this country, it&#039;s beyond me that this technology hasn&#039;t caught on over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The city of Vienna in Austria has a large incinerator right in town which generates steam heat for the nearby General Hospital, as well as numerous other buildings around town.  The exterior was designed by artist Fritz Hundertwasser and is a pretty wild sight to behold. They also produce electricity in the process.  I&#8217;m under the impression that the Europeans are much more sensitive to environmental pollution than we are, so I have to assume that their restrictions on air pollution are pretty strict.  Metals are removed from the ash after incineration and recycled. The added benefit, of course, is a severely reduced need for landfill space.  Since we generate so much more garbage per person in this country, it&#8217;s beyond me that this technology hasn&#8217;t caught on over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salman</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator>Salman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4275</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Clinton. You may write to me at salman.alg@gmail.com to know more about the WTE industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Clinton. You may write to me at <a href="mailto:salman.alg@gmail.com">salman.alg@gmail.com</a> to know more about the WTE industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4265</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4265</guid>
		<description>I am very interested in the Waste-to-Energy industry. Could any of you point me in a direction where I could get some more facts and some of the concerns people have about WTE plants? Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very interested in the Waste-to-Energy industry. Could any of you point me in a direction where I could get some more facts and some of the concerns people have about WTE plants? Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4108</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-4108</guid>
		<description>There is public opposition of energy from waste facilities.  When I was first introduced to this idea my first thought was billowing black toxic smoke caused by burning garbage.  As I have become more educated over the years I have learned that it is much more regulated than other industry emitters.  Most likely driven from public opposition.  In an idealistic world recycling is the answer.  But in a realistic world recycling recycling and energy from waste are both going to play a role in waste management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is public opposition of energy from waste facilities.  When I was first introduced to this idea my first thought was billowing black toxic smoke caused by burning garbage.  As I have become more educated over the years I have learned that it is much more regulated than other industry emitters.  Most likely driven from public opposition.  In an idealistic world recycling is the answer.  But in a realistic world recycling recycling and energy from waste are both going to play a role in waste management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>I disagree with what your saying howard...You&#039;ve given no true stats with your response and there has not been a magic discovery of a method to burn for energy without emissions. Even if they have cut back heavily on emissions they are still emitting and they have most likely only solved the problem for the big emissions what about volatile organic compounds that are left over that destroy the environment and just because the ash can be reused doesn&#039;t secure that it will be. Reusing ash could be more expensive than it&#039;s worth to the programs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with what your saying howard&#8230;You&#8217;ve given no true stats with your response and there has not been a magic discovery of a method to burn for energy without emissions. Even if they have cut back heavily on emissions they are still emitting and they have most likely only solved the problem for the big emissions what about volatile organic compounds that are left over that destroy the environment and just because the ash can be reused doesn&#8217;t secure that it will be. Reusing ash could be more expensive than it&#8217;s worth to the programs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard hager</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator>howard hager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/negative-impacts-waste-to-energy/#comment-2863</guid>
		<description>This paragraph is very misleading concerning today&#039;s WTE plants.  The EPA has srtict rules and most countries do as well.  Here in the USA the EPA is very active and monitors all WTE sites.  Covanta energy has a track record of being 90-99% below EPA emmission standards.  The go to great lengths in their design to make sur ethe emmissions are not harmful.  This isn&#039;t incineration as was the case years ago.  This is reduction of waste under controlled heat with out gasses being subjected to emission controls that are automated and strict.  This has been the case for over the past many years for their plants.  They have been awarded environmental awards from the EPA and others because of the safe emmisiions.  It is a disservice to lump them with the incineration plants of old.  One can verify this by looking at the EPA and their web sites or visiting a plant.  It makes safe renewable energy from the home grown local renewable fuel... trash.  Oh also they do recycling at these plants.  Metals are extracted and the resultant ash (90% reduction from the trash put into the system) has a recycle use also.  The plants input sources can be after recycling companies pull addition materials out like cardboard and plastics.   This energy production is safe, clean, helps keep landfills from filling up and does recycling form local fuel material(trash).  So what elese does this kind of energy manufacturing not coal or gas or oil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paragraph is very misleading concerning today&#8217;s WTE plants.  The EPA has srtict rules and most countries do as well.  Here in the USA the EPA is very active and monitors all WTE sites.  Covanta energy has a track record of being 90-99% below EPA emmission standards.  The go to great lengths in their design to make sur ethe emmissions are not harmful.  This isn&#8217;t incineration as was the case years ago.  This is reduction of waste under controlled heat with out gasses being subjected to emission controls that are automated and strict.  This has been the case for over the past many years for their plants.  They have been awarded environmental awards from the EPA and others because of the safe emmisiions.  It is a disservice to lump them with the incineration plants of old.  One can verify this by looking at the EPA and their web sites or visiting a plant.  It makes safe renewable energy from the home grown local renewable fuel&#8230; trash.  Oh also they do recycling at these plants.  Metals are extracted and the resultant ash (90% reduction from the trash put into the system) has a recycle use also.  The plants input sources can be after recycling companies pull addition materials out like cardboard and plastics.   This energy production is safe, clean, helps keep landfills from filling up and does recycling form local fuel material(trash).  So what elese does this kind of energy manufacturing not coal or gas or oil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

