<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flexible Solar Powered Rooftop Shingles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/</link>
	<description>Alternative Energy News and Information about Renewable Energy Technologies: Articles, Discussions, News and Videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-8624</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-8624</guid>
		<description>Paul Barnes notes that Nanosolar (A Google backed California Company) started this off.  They did not actually invent the process, but they did take it and run with the idea.  Their production costs are less than $1 per watt, making the electricity price-competitive with that of the grid.  Which, as we all know, only goes up.  And as for balance of system costs, that depends somewhat on whether or not you have a stand alone system, or purely grid tied, in which case your power might go out when the grid goes down.  If you do indeed have battery backup, inverter etc., then, yes your costs are higher, but not prohibitive.  Any half decent DIY person can keep the installation costs down to almost nothing.
Personally, I like the idea that my power NEVER fails me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Barnes notes that Nanosolar (A Google backed California Company) started this off.  They did not actually invent the process, but they did take it and run with the idea.  Their production costs are less than $1 per watt, making the electricity price-competitive with that of the grid.  Which, as we all know, only goes up.  And as for balance of system costs, that depends somewhat on whether or not you have a stand alone system, or purely grid tied, in which case your power might go out when the grid goes down.  If you do indeed have battery backup, inverter etc., then, yes your costs are higher, but not prohibitive.  Any half decent DIY person can keep the installation costs down to almost nothing.<br />
Personally, I like the idea that my power NEVER fails me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cancerman72</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>cancerman72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>I think I have seen this installed one of those Green show a few months back. Its a great concept. I forget what the show was called. Anyone remember?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I have seen this installed one of those Green show a few months back. Its a great concept. I forget what the show was called. Anyone remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6791</guid>
		<description>I think flexible solar is a good idea, especially in the area of Texas where I live where damaging hail is a potential problem as well as extreme winds.  The way I see it, being able to flex would be very beneficial.  But, that&#039;s just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think flexible solar is a good idea, especially in the area of Texas where I live where damaging hail is a potential problem as well as extreme winds.  The way I see it, being able to flex would be very beneficial.  But, that&#8217;s just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6767</guid>
		<description>This is still the holy grail search for aesthetics that meets the efficiency required to justify. If we aren&#039;t so anal about appearance and realized that simple is better, we wouldn&#039;t be having this discussion. I totally agree with research to expand our future options but the mindset of many is similar to the analogy that when cars reach 100mpg AND cost less that $20K, then I&#039;ll do it. Not very wise thinking. We need to remember that the market still drives innovation but holding of on progress when we are in the economic and technological  void of today is not wise. Support innovation by moving forward in small steps if neccessary. JMHO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is still the holy grail search for aesthetics that meets the efficiency required to justify. If we aren&#8217;t so anal about appearance and realized that simple is better, we wouldn&#8217;t be having this discussion. I totally agree with research to expand our future options but the mindset of many is similar to the analogy that when cars reach 100mpg AND cost less that $20K, then I&#8217;ll do it. Not very wise thinking. We need to remember that the market still drives innovation but holding of on progress when we are in the economic and technological  void of today is not wise. Support innovation by moving forward in small steps if neccessary. JMHO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6765</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6765</guid>
		<description>I think you will find that this idea is already in production. I think the idea comes from a company called nanosolar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you will find that this idea is already in production. I think the idea comes from a company called nanosolar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony DeMerchant</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6820</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony DeMerchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6820</guid>
		<description>Flexible solar panels shingles this I really like. Nice point of view Charles on wind turbines and solar panels a concept need doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flexible solar panels shingles this I really like. Nice point of view Charles on wind turbines and solar panels a concept need doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6819</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6819</guid>
		<description>See I say again, why aren&#039;t wind turbines covered in solar panels? they could easily be producing double if not triple the power and consistently too, not just when its windy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See I say again, why aren&#8217;t wind turbines covered in solar panels? they could easily be producing double if not triple the power and consistently too, not just when its windy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Lancaster Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6818</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Lancaster Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6818</guid>
		<description>This is brilliant and should be standard for all new houses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is brilliant and should be standard for all new houses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Seaver</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6817</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Seaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6817</guid>
		<description>Been hearing about this, I look forward to applications like this catching on, it&#039;s about time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been hearing about this, I look forward to applications like this catching on, it&#8217;s about time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/flexible-solar-powered-rooftop-shingles/#comment-6816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules Hazard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/?p=651#comment-6816</guid>
		<description>So the question is... is it like the old ones? cause you could not walk on those, they would get damaged... cool though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the question is&#8230; is it like the old ones? cause you could not walk on those, they would get damaged&#8230; cool though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
