<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E85 Health Report Disputed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/e85-health-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/e85-health-report/</link>
	<description>Alternative Energy News and Information about Renewable Energy Technologies: Articles, Discussions, News and Videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/e85-health-report/#comment-9979</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/e85-health-report/#comment-9979</guid>
		<description>On &quot;E-85 Health Risk Disputed&quot; whoever it was making these claims is either confusing ethanol with gasoline, which we know is damaging to the o-zone and causes health risk.  Ethanol produces CO2 and water as an exhaust, and the big danger is the gasoline used to denature it. The CO2 released is completely recycled back to the next planting from the previous years crop.  Who ever made these claims must be an oil company exec or some one well paid to perpetrate such a lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On &#8220;E-85 Health Risk Disputed&#8221; whoever it was making these claims is either confusing ethanol with gasoline, which we know is damaging to the o-zone and causes health risk.  Ethanol produces CO2 and water as an exhaust, and the big danger is the gasoline used to denature it. The CO2 released is completely recycled back to the next planting from the previous years crop.  Who ever made these claims must be an oil company exec or some one well paid to perpetrate such a lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

