<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternative Fuels Can Boost Pollution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/</link>
	<description>Alternative Energy News and Information about Renewable Energy Technologies: Articles, Discussions, News and Videos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Kaduwanema</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kaduwanema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>That appears to be a contradiction in terms but at least it provides an alternative view of the prevailing perceived wisdom. I wonder how  the UN will react to such findings. And of course there is a danger that the &quot;non-believers&quot; will jump on the bandwagon and refuse to participate in any environmental projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That appears to be a contradiction in terms but at least it provides an alternative view of the prevailing perceived wisdom. I wonder how  the UN will react to such findings. And of course there is a danger that the &#8220;non-believers&#8221; will jump on the bandwagon and refuse to participate in any environmental projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1573</link>
		<dc:creator>Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>First off, liquid coal is not a real alternative fuel because &#039;duh&#039; it&#039;s still coal and thus still a normal fossile fuel. I mean that&#039;s like turning liquid gasoline into a solid or a gas and calling it &quot;an alternative fuel&quot;. Second, corn ethanol is a waste of time and resources. Switchgrass on the otherhand, produces over 1,000 gallons per acre of ethanol. Roughly the same as corn and sugarcane put together and it&#039;s Not a food source and can be more easily grown without as much crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, liquid coal is not a real alternative fuel because &#8216;duh&#8217; it&#8217;s still coal and thus still a normal fossile fuel. I mean that&#8217;s like turning liquid gasoline into a solid or a gas and calling it &#8220;an alternative fuel&#8221;. Second, corn ethanol is a waste of time and resources. Switchgrass on the otherhand, produces over 1,000 gallons per acre of ethanol. Roughly the same as corn and sugarcane put together and it&#8217;s Not a food source and can be more easily grown without as much crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NanoDetonator.com</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>NanoDetonator.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>Interesting,

I wonder where author researched liquid coal data?  This is not even close to true according to several new liquid coal conversion technologies I have been researching.

Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., (OTC BB: SLGLF) views new amendments to Regulation SHO; Final Rule as a positive outlook towards our listing on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Please read the full SHO rules here: http://sec.gov/rules/final/2007/34-56212.pdf

SILVERADO has been working six years with the head of its Green Fuel Division, Dr. Warrack Willson, who is an industry leader in the development of low-rank coal-water fuels (LRCWF). This fuel is made from hydrothermally treated low-rank coals (LRCs), sub-bituminous, lignitic, and brown coals. It is a low cost, non-toxic, non-hazardous and environmentally friendly substitute for petroleum derived fuels mainly in industrial and utility boilers, gasifiers, and other advanced combustors. Initial process economics indicate that LRCWF can be produced from any American LRC for under $15 per barrel, on an oil equivalent energy basis.

Silverado&#039;s LRCWF (Green Fuel), so named due to its environmental friendliness, is an ideal candidate for use in high pressure liquid fed gasifiers, like the one developed by Texaco now being marketed by G.E. The product, synthesis gas, can then be converted by any one of a number of commercial Fischer Tropsch proc esses to yield a myriad of clean fuels and petrochemicals. The products are free of nitrogen, sulfur, particulate matter, and heavy metals and will find many applications, including aviation and auto gasoline, diesel, synthetic natural gas, naphtha, fertilizers, ammonia, urea, plastics and many others. 

On April 9, 2007, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour and Congressman Roger Wicker joined other state officials to kick off the Silverado Green Fuel Demonstration Project with a ground-breaking ceremony at the Red Hills EcoPlex site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting,</p>
<p>I wonder where author researched liquid coal data?  This is not even close to true according to several new liquid coal conversion technologies I have been researching.</p>
<p>Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., (OTC BB: SLGLF) views new amendments to Regulation SHO; Final Rule as a positive outlook towards our listing on the OTC Bulletin Board.<br />
Please read the full SHO rules here: <a href="http://sec.gov/rules/final/2007/34-56212.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://sec.gov/rules/final/2007/34-56212.pdf</a></p>
<p>SILVERADO has been working six years with the head of its Green Fuel Division, Dr. Warrack Willson, who is an industry leader in the development of low-rank coal-water fuels (LRCWF). This fuel is made from hydrothermally treated low-rank coals (LRCs), sub-bituminous, lignitic, and brown coals. It is a low cost, non-toxic, non-hazardous and environmentally friendly substitute for petroleum derived fuels mainly in industrial and utility boilers, gasifiers, and other advanced combustors. Initial process economics indicate that LRCWF can be produced from any American LRC for under $15 per barrel, on an oil equivalent energy basis.</p>
<p>Silverado&#8217;s LRCWF (Green Fuel), so named due to its environmental friendliness, is an ideal candidate for use in high pressure liquid fed gasifiers, like the one developed by Texaco now being marketed by G.E. The product, synthesis gas, can then be converted by any one of a number of commercial Fischer Tropsch proc esses to yield a myriad of clean fuels and petrochemicals. The products are free of nitrogen, sulfur, particulate matter, and heavy metals and will find many applications, including aviation and auto gasoline, diesel, synthetic natural gas, naphtha, fertilizers, ammonia, urea, plastics and many others. </p>
<p>On April 9, 2007, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour and Congressman Roger Wicker joined other state officials to kick off the Silverado Green Fuel Demonstration Project with a ground-breaking ceremony at the Red Hills EcoPlex site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/alternative-fuel-pollution/#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>The solutions are here... They just need some more research to perfect and make them more efficient. Nonetheless, there are powerful people who aren&#039;t interested in shifting from oil to other energy sources. Hmmm... I&#039;m wondering if this oil thing is profitable to someone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solutions are here&#8230; They just need some more research to perfect and make them more efficient. Nonetheless, there are powerful people who aren&#8217;t interested in shifting from oil to other energy sources. Hmmm&#8230; I&#8217;m wondering if this oil thing is profitable to someone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
